This week the Wall Street Journal has an in depth report titled "Innovations in Agriculture". Although most of the WSJ is behind a paywall, I think the whole report is available for free (for now). The stories are wide ranging, but focus largely on technological innovations to improve the efficiency, and perhaps arguably--the sustainability of agriculture. The picture above is from a story on large scale vertical farming in cities. There are also stories on robotic field hands, the most effective no-till strategies, developing perennial versions of wheat, using water more efficiently, as well as a number of other stories.
There is a long tradition of using technology to achieve sustainability, even among "hippies". See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whole_Earth_Catalog
But many folks harbor mistrust of technological approaches, particularly when applied to agriculture. These suspicions have perhaps been most notably apparent in the debate over GMO technologies. For these folks, parts of the WSJ report may read more like something out of Soylent Green.What do you think should be the role of technology in developing a future agriculture? How about the related question of the role of "capital" in agriculture....exemplified by the industrialists, bankers, venture capitalists, and stock traders who form the bulk of the readership of the WSJ?
After briefly reviewing the WSJ article, I feel the current role of technology in developing the future of agriculture is very innovative, visually spectacular, and an overall win-win situation for the environments and the living organisms, insects, animals, and human that will not only share in this, but benefit as well! Why didn't I think of this!! After all, don't you see $$$...!!! This is a GREAT article...Thank-You Dr. John!
ReplyDeleteAlthough it is interesting and innovative. This ideas major drawback is the fact that much like the "green revolution" provided farming techniques in order to keep up with growing population and demand, this idea reeks of denial and cheek-turning in the face of soil and water quality. When I see projects like this, I can't help but think there are less eco-minded folks going, 'okay great. We have a solution now that makes the use of soil to grow plants obsolete. So this means we can ignore the current problem of land pollution and keep building and laying concrete because we don't need soil anymore!' And besides, I personally like getting my hands dirty and working with the soil so this idea sounds horrible to me.
ReplyDelete